Search This Blog

Saturday, April 5, 2014

Oru Kanniyum Moonru Kalavaanikalum - Why the 2 Xerox copies!

NAME –ORU KANNIYUM MOONU KALAVAANIKALUM – Why the 2 Xerox copies?

Cast: - Arulnithi (1. Vansam (M.K.Thamizharasu) 2. Udhayan (Prabhakaran) 3. Mouna Guru (M.K.Thamizharasu) 4. Thagaraaru (Dayanidhi Azhagiri)), Bindu Madhavi, Ashritha Shetty, Nassar, Manobala, M.S.Bhaskar, Delhi Ganesh, V.S.Raghavan among others
& Crew: - Direction, story & Screenplay: - Chimbu Devan (1. Imsai Arasan 23m Pulikesi 2. Arai En 305.iL Kadavul 3. Irumbukkottai Murattu Singam) Music- Nataraja Sankaran, D.O.P.-S.R.Kathir, Edit- Sreekar Prasad
Producer: - M.K.Thamizharasu
Track list: - Total duration of songs: - NA.
The story, backdrop and setting (Screen play) the premise is a definite lift from 12B (Tamil)/Sliding doors (English) with a screenplay mix of Soodhu Kavum & Moodar koodam & the climax once again inspired from the English film Graduate and Kamal’s Raja Paarvai. The director’s has, it appears, stated that he was inspired by the film “Run Lola Run”. In my opinion this film is a farfetched inspiration of R.L.R!  It is about the hero (Arulnithi), his friend & the heroine’s friend (Bindhu Madhavi) planning to kidnap the heroine, Isabella, who is forced to marry a boy of her father/grandfather’s choice at a church. The story is divided into 3 parts. The premise of the story open in the heavenly abode with Shiva & Brahma answering Naradha’s query regarding destiny and fate of human beings. Lord Shiva explains the concept showcasing the life of one such affected soul ‘Arulnithi’ and his tryst with fate & destiny. Part 1 starts at a particular time. This part opens with the Arulnithi & Bindhu planning the kidnap and soon joined by Bagvathy Perumal (Bugs/N.K.P.K) and Karthik Sabesh who form the foursome to execute the kidnap plan. Nassar is the comic villain of the piece and promises the hero 30 lakhs if he manages to successfully kidnap Isabella (Ashritha Shetty). Karthik Sabesh accidentally fires the gun and brings down the ceiling fan rendering him unconscious. Karthik Sabesh hereon becomes the silent quotient for the rest of the film. Now the hero and his two friends (threesome) on a bike decide to execute the kidnap plan. What follows is the best part of this film. It is filled with humorous real life anecdotes one after another, some of which brings a smile while others make you laugh. Finally the threesome reach the church in a bid to kidnap Isabella and the final outcome of their efforts forms the climax. Part 2 Starts a few minutes later the premise is a carbon copy of part 1 except for the real life situations. Characters and incidents have subtle changes to correlate the time factor and the story. Now comes Part 3 this starts a few minutes later than the other 2 parts and this one is the Xerox copy of the other 2 parts and based on the same premise with the director once again effected more changes to the incidents, players & characters in the final of this three part screenplay.
& the Climax all 3 parts as you may have realized by now have different climax. The first one was more entertaining than the second one but the third one, very tiresome!
Acting: - Arulnithi as Tamizh I have a strong feeling that Arulnidhi somehow likes to be referred to by ‘native’ names! Here is a guy who acts reasonably well and is endowed with a decent build and height which he should capitalize on! But somehow chooses scripts (powered by his in-house production house) which are either masala or highly nondescript and diluted. In other words a script centered on a sport or a police officer or even better a suave play boy would serve him well for the future. In this film he has very little or no role to showcase any of his plus points.
Bindu Madhavi is totally wasted by the director. She neither serves as the glamour quotient nor has she been used for her acting prowess. In fact in my opinion this character was totally unnecessary for this film. Such acts only add up to the budget and nothing more!
Ashritha Shetty as Isabella here is another example of wasted talent. Why Ashritha? She had shown shades of good acting in the film ‘Soodhu Kavum”.
Bagavathi Perumal, this actor should go places in Tamil cinema. He is a versatile actor and his eyes are a big asset. He underplays his role and his voice modulation is excellent. He is the biggest plus for this film. In fact he will soon give Santhanam and the others a run for their money! (If he lands a plum role)
Karthik Sabesh is the sleeping quotient in this film as was Isabella, the nonexistent (Manasakshi) quotient in Soodhu Kavum.
Aadukalam Naren as the encounter inspector is another plus to this film.
Aruldas as the flying squad inspector is a revelation. He fits the role to the tee!
Paandu also ran!
Nassar as Hippy Lahri I have repeatedly stated that these days this veteran and greatly talented actor is repeatedly being used as an object of ridicule. Somehow pains me to see him being misused this way!
M.S. Bhakar a passerby cracks a joke on polygamy (I wonder whom he was referring to though) and nothing more.
Jayaprakash as the doctor is adequate but anyone could have essayed this role.
Manobala as the Malayalee tea shop owner is adequate but his dialogue delivery gives him away as an imitation.
Delhi Ganesh as the Brahmin neighbor is adequate and has done ‘hazaar’ such roles and once again walks through this one.
V.S.Raghavan as the father in law to be mouths exactly 21 lines of dialogues more as a guest appearance.
Ravi Raghavendra as the father in law also ran.
Camera: - The D.O.P has done a fairly decent job with the camera and lighting. Was pretty good during the crowd scenes in the theatre and inside the church. The bike ride sequences were pretty neat and acceptable.
Music: - Why???
Art: - Adequate. On the whole nothing unusual except for the retro feel to the Brahma/Shiva/Nardha scenes.
Choreo: - Mostly montage sequences and nothing more.
Stunts: - Thrust and out of place!
Edit: - The ones that are Okay: - 1. Once again an interesting premise 2. Bagavathi Perumal 3. Most of the characters normally referred as the ‘rest’ in my reviews 4. The Series of sequences just before the bike ride the one with Delhi Ganesh, Paandu, and the rest and the ones during the bike ride which were the best, the tryst of the threesome with the inspector (Aadukalam Naren) at the tea shop and Diesel, the scene when they are stopped by the flying squad cop (Aruldas). 5. The bike running on PVC bottle filled with petrol 6. A few sequences inside the church 7. The hiccup scene (Bagavathi Perumal)
The one’s that are MoKai: - 1) the irksome second part repeat of the premise and even more tiresome repeat of third part.  2) Wasted main leads (anyone could have performed these characters) 3) Why 3 parts of the same premise 4) Songs were basically unnecessary fillers and were a lag and BG rather misplaced and repetitive most often times. 4) Brahma/Shiva/Nerada introduction and interludes served no useful purpose 5) some of the characters to showcase time was irksome and avoidable 6) the purpose of ant scene was quite perplexing 7) the fight scene to showcase Arunlnithi as an action hero? Wow! Plain stupid!
Finally to sum it all up, a quote: "The culture of independent film criticism has totally gone down the drain and this seems to come with the territory of the consumer age that we are now living in." - Wim Wenders
Left right & Centre: - 5-6 Students and working professionals: - Okay….Watchable but to be frank we think the repeat of the same story 3 times was boring and made the film slow.  Centre (Man & Woman):- We quite liked the film and my friend on my right: - For god’s sake why do our directors spoil a good idea by overdoing it!
Bottom Line: - What’s all the fuss about the “Kanni” (Virgin) when the film is a lift from so many “USED” and “REUSED” story lines!
12B + Sliding Doors + Soodhu Kavum +MoodarKoodam + Raja Paarvai +Graduate & Run Lola Run – Definitely not “VIRGIN” by a long shot!
Until next time,    
Director Haricharan
Chennai

05/04/2014

No comments: