AARU OF BLOOD - TAHAGARAARU
A film like Thagaraaaru is like Thirunelveli Halwa to a
reviewer. It really gives him enough and more ammunition to do a postmortem in
the literal sense as to how not to make a film. I really wonder as to why an
experienced production house like Cloud Nine so easily falls prey to such
blatantly avoidable traps while making a film. When a production house of
repute invests millions in making a film they should necessarily have an
excellent internal and external team to wet the raw scripts, make necessary
changes to cater to the audience they have in mind. Even a ‘Masala’ film like
Thagaraaru is no exception to this cardinal rule. Cloud Nine has probably made
an emotional issue (Arul Nidhi) to cloud their decision making in making such a
mess of a movie!
I would now like to share with you my experience in watching
the film THAGARAARU.
Let me start with the
films back story: -
The film has been produced by Dayanidhi Azhagiri & Vivek Rathnavel. The man
at the helm Ganesh Vinayaac is the director of the film. It has Arulnithi and
Poorna playing the lead roles, supported by Jaiprakash, Pawan, Tarun Shatriya,
Mayilsamy, Murugadoss, Bava Lakshmanan, Aruldoss etc.
The story, backdrop and
setting (Screen play)
The story is the usual Tamil masala set in Madurai (acceding to the producers
sentiments). It focuses on the conflict between true love and friendship on one
side, revenge and vendetta on the other side. It has the usual “Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah”,
“Deiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Thookkuda Avanai”, “pottu thalluda ivanai”, “edura
avan sangai” (adams apple) etc. The Kollywood Samurai, the legendary ‘Aruval’
(Sickle) is used with aplomb to draw blood from every other person in the film
but unlike the Samurai it is never sheathed. The infused bloody twist in the
climax is supposedly the highlight of this endless masala caper but the climax
is a bloodless coup!
The director is obviously an avid Tamil film buff. The hero
of the film, Saravanan, is a replicated mould of the character, Parithiveeran.
Arulnithi is the innocent maverick on the inside but crude and tough on the
exterior. The heroine is suspense filled milder version of Sriya Sarin in “Thimuru”
and Bhavana in “Arya”. The film also has visible shades of Subramaniapuram,
Run, and ThoongaNagaram etc to lend more variety. The hero and his friends, all
orphans, are engaged in small time thievery. They use all the innovative
methods in ‘the book of Chennai thievery’ to rob and steal from locked and
vacant houses. They are so daring and impartial that they neither spare the
local police nor the local don. The hero then gives one coy look at the heroine
(Poorna) and turns into a love sick whimpering pussy cat. The heroine initially
thwarts the hero (Run sentiment) but then reciprocates in all earnestness. I
will not reveal the rest, not because I don’t want to, but honestly there is
nothing more to reveal. Why in god’s name do these villains come one by one to
get bashed up by the hero, why does the brave but stupid cop always lands up
alone to get bashed up by everyone around, why are there so many baddies
loitering all over the place and even the one good man in the film is a baddie.
There is so much blood that one day even the Bay of Bengal may red! I implore
upon directors and producers to please spare some thought to the average viewer
who is paying good money to watch a film!
Acting: - I urge Arulnithi to hereafter
prudently choose scripts after careful thought, bearing in mind his clear
height advantage and phenomenal screen presence. He should stop shaking his
head repeatedly to showcase emotions like coyness and gullibility. His voice
modulation should improve as it develops a rather nasal tone when the pitch
increases and dangerously borders on femininity. He has talent and an eagerness to improve as
seen from Mouna Guru to Thagaraaru but the scripts he chooses are so stereo
typed. Poorna, on the other hand, has done her bit to enhance the shallow story
line. She plays a major part in the infused climax which should augur well for
her to grab meaty roles in future. The humorous ‘Subramaniapuram’ friends are
the serious ‘Thagaraaru’ friends with a major part of their vagabond presence
in TASMAC. Jaiprakash has now taken over from Prakash Raj as the official
collar flicking don of Tamil cinema. Aruldass is the ugly, bad and the good
villain. Poorna’s mother is once again the stereotyped nagging mother. The rest
are all the “Deiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii, Eiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
Edungada Sangai, Pottu Thallungada” Aruval-in-hand-Adiyals who roam all over
the hundreds of cinema screens all over Tamilnadu. Let me now move on to the technicians:-
Technicians:- The DOP Dillraj has used the
camera well and in parts even excelled and enhanced the visual quotient of the
film without which the film would have catapulted into oblivion. In fact the
opening shot of zooming in on the location of the plot created an expectation
but the shoddy screen prevents any further showcasing of his talent. In spite
of so many characters effecting bloody cuts in the film, the editor Suresh has
managed the cuts very well and has effectively decreased the lags which could
have made the film a total torture. Dillip Subbarayan has handled the stunts
using the typical Kollywood in what I term as the ‘punching bag’ formula – when
the hero hits you fly into oblivion only to reappear magically to get hit again
and again. The sickles, pipes, sticks, breaking of glass, tables, furniture,
windshield etc can be seen to your heart’s content. The hero and the villains
can be effectively used to demolish anything in this universe!
Music:-
The music director Dharan Kumar has used all the nuances required to
fill in for the lack of story and screen play. The “Nanba Nanba” song to highlight the bonding and friendship
blends well with the choreography. The rerecording by Praveen Sathya fills the
noise quotient needed for this genre.
Left right &
Centre:-
Rather than voicing my opinion I decided to turn to the
person on my left and he answered as only an avid, discerning Tamil film viewer
can “ Too! Too! lengthy, saar! Dragging, saar! Orey violence, not a family
subject”. I had no one on my right or
centre this time to invite further comments.
Pro: - Those who are ardent fans of the
genre ‘MASALA’!
Con: - Mediocrity continues to rule
Tamil Cinema.
Bottom Line:-
The Hero and the Sickle are seldom separated!
Until next time,
Director
Haricharan
No comments:
Post a Comment